【溫馨提示】壓縮包內(nèi)含CAD圖有下方大圖片預(yù)覽，下拉即可直觀呈現(xiàn)眼前查看、盡收眼底縱觀。打包內(nèi)容里dwg后綴的文件為CAD圖，可編輯，無(wú)水印，高清圖，壓縮包內(nèi)文檔可直接點(diǎn)開(kāi)預(yù)覽，需要原稿請(qǐng)自助充值下載，所見(jiàn)才能所得，請(qǐng)見(jiàn)壓縮包內(nèi)的文件及下方預(yù)覽，請(qǐng)細(xì)心查看有疑問(wèn)可以咨詢QQ：11970985或197216396
畢 業(yè) 設(shè) 計(jì)（論 文）外 文 翻 譯
設(shè)計(jì)（論文）題目：
無(wú)人駕駛電動(dòng)汽車(chē)再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的設(shè)
?
計(jì)
學(xué)生姓名：
專(zhuān)??業(yè)：
所在學(xué)院：
指導(dǎo)教師：
職??稱：
?
年12月31日
Research of automobile regenerative brake
The automotive industry has for many years identified weight reduction as a way of improving product competitiveness and thus the ability to make profits. One area that has been examined for weight reduction is vehicle with regenerative braking system (RBS). The greatest advantages of electric vehicles (EVs), and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) is their ability to recover significant amounts of braking energy using a RBS. Regenerative braking is an effective method to extend brake disc life, minimise disc rotor weight, minimise brake pad wear and to extend the working range of an EV or HEV. Regenerative braking would extend the working range of an EV or HEV provided that any extra energy consumption e.g. from increased vehicle mass and system losses did not outweigh the saving from energy recuperation, also reduce duty levels on the brakes themselves, giving advantages including extended brake rotor and friction material life, but more importantly reduced brake mass, minimise brake pad wear. The objective of this research is to define thermal performance on lightweight disc brake models. Thermal performance was a key factor which was studied using the 3D model in Finite Element Analysis simulations. Ultimately a design method for lightweight brakes suitable for use on any car-sized hybrid vehicle was used from previous analysis. The design requirement, including reducing the thickness, would affect the temperature distribution and increase stress at the critical area. Based on the relationship obtained between rotor weight, thickness, undercut effect and offset between hat and friction ring, criteria have been established for designing lightweight brake discs in a vehicle with regenerative braking.
It has been estimated that up to 70% of the kinetic energy of a passenger car could be dissipated through the friction brakes and the other (up to) 30% of the energy could be recuperated e.g. in the form of electrical power [1]-[2]. The need for conversion from kinetic energy to thermal energy by friction brakes therefore will decrease once regenerative braking is present in the system. The rest of the energy can be converted e.g. to electrical energy via a motor/generator (M/G). For a car with regenerative braking under a single stop braking event, where the energy dissipated via the front disc brakes is estimated as 70% of the total kinetic energy.
Manuscript received October 9, 2012; revised December 4, 2012. This work was supported in part by the UTM Razak School of Engineering and Advanced Technology under Grant 4J079.
weight reduction as a way of improving product competitiveness and thus achieving commercial success. To achieve reduction in weight, components made of materials such as iron and steel can be replaced with re-designed components made of lighter materials such as polymers and aluminium. One area that has been examined for weight reduction is the brake system, e.g. aluminium and associated composite materials such as ?metal matrix composites? (MMC) for brake rotors have been studied extensively. Although aluminium is increasingly used in modern brake components, the frictional and thermal requirements of a modern automotive brake have limited its use for brake discs [3]. Friction brakes get hot when used and the heat energy is dissipated by forced convection, conduction and radiation from the exposed surfaces of the brake. Over-heating can cause malfunction of the braking system and present a safety hazard. Much theoretical work has been done to calculate accurately the temperature rise during braking for different speeds and designs of brake discs. [3]–[8] so the extent of the thermal loading on brake discs (rotors) is well-known.
Disc brakes are widely used on cars because of their better heat dissipation ability; a direct result of the exposed friction surface. The friction surface of a drum brake is inside and heat dissipation relies upon heat being conducted through the drum so car manufacturers fit drum brakes only on the rear axle of “l(fā)ow” performance cars. Additionally a drum brake provides a very effective parking brake. In commercial vehicles, drum brakes are still widely used across the world, being robust, durable and easy to maintain but in Europe most heavy goods vehicles now use disc brakes [9]. Furthermore, the performance requirement is not just for one isolated brake application, but for a series of high deceleration brake applications which form the part of the performance assessment known as the ?fade? test. So, the front brakes of a typical passenger car have to be designed to provide large amounts of braking torque, and withstand large amounts of heat generated, heat transfer, high temperatures and thermal loading. The size (and weight) of a car?s disc brake therefore depends upon the performance required, specifically the braking torque, energy dissipation and power. It is possible to generate high braking torque from a smaller brake, but the energy and power involved may overload the brake and cause physical damage. Lightweight disc brakes (smaller in size using lighter materials designed for lower duty) have potential for passenger cars with regenerative braking. Regenerative braking is a feature of a hybrid and pure electric power train to recoup some of the energy dissipated during braking [10]. EVs and HEVs have the ability to recover significant amounts of braking energy using the electrical part of the power train as a RBS. However, even with regenerative braking, friction brakes are required to provide the necessary high duty braking performance, e.g. in the event of an emergency stop being required. Regenerative braking therefore has to work alongside a conventional friction system because the braking power in an emergency is too high for a purely electrical regenerative system: this is primarily due to the limited energy transfer rate of electrical energy storage devices. Regenerative braking does however take work off the friction brakes of a vehicle, thereby extending brake disc life, minimising disc rotor weight, minimising brake pad wear and extending the working range of an EV or HEV.
Regenerative braking in an EV cannot be used when the batteries are fully charged, or when the battery is at a high temperature because this could damage the battery. At low vehicle speeds regenerative braking could generate high braking torque causing vehicle instability (if a continuously variable transmission (CVT) is used to keep the M/G at its optimum operating speed); this need to be carefully controlled to avoid poor braking ?feel?. Braking energy recuperation for hybrid vehicles has been investigated by Ehsani et al., [2] using computer simulation to analyse the relationship between the recuperated braking energy from front wheels to the total braking energy available in a typical urban driving cycle. The results showed that 50% - 60% of braking energy could be recovered by regenerative braking in urban driving. Regenerative braking can recover about 45% of total kinetic energy for a city bus。
The design of the connection between the friction ring and the hub is important in a lightweight brake disc. The importance of this connection has been recognised and understood for many years [16] and car brake disc designers pay careful attention to the design of the so-called “top hat” region of the disc. Which friction face is mounted to the top hat, and the design of “undercut” both enable coning to be controlled within acceptable limits. However the lightweight brake disc of the type proposed here has a completely different temperature profile, both in terms of the magnitude of the temperatures reached during braking, and the distribution of temperature in the disc. This is also known from the use of lightweight discs on motorcycles but, again, International Journal of Applied Physics and Mathematics, Vol. 3, No. 1, January 2013 5 7 the duty levels are much different. This work predicts the magnitude and distribution of temperature in a lightweight brake disc for a passenger car and consequently the expected coning. It therefore provides an indication of what design steps must be taken to keep coning to acceptable levels in operation.
It can be concluded that stainless steel is a suitable material for a lightweight brake disc in terms of mechanical and thermal strength, provided that the tribological characteristics are suitable (e.g. it might be advantageous to use different pad materials). Stainless steel is suitable to be used for disc thicknesses less than 8 mm because stainless steel has three times the tensile strength of cast iron (Table IV). For disc thicknesses of 8 mm or greater cast iron is suitable because of its high thermal conductivity and low Young?s modulus, which limit the amount of disc damage caused by the heat flux generated by friction. When choosing the best disc material, aside from the properties which have been referred to in Table I, the heat capacity of the material has been shown to be as significant as the thermal conductivity. Disc material with higher heat capacity can decrease both the maximum surface temperature and the maximum stress applied to the disc surface. But stainless steel seems to be a good material for a lightweight disc, and it is better than Al-MMC because of its higher MOT. A disc made of stainless steel is designed to minimise stresses and distortion.
The contribution made by this research work to the field of vehicle braking is twofold. Firstly, the friction brakes can be downsized on a car with regenerative braking. Reducing the mass of the brake disc must consider temperatures, stresses, wear, deformation and durability. Second the example developed in this research illustrates that it is possible to reduce the brake disc mass by using a lightweight solid disc. The paper also presents a design approach for a lightweight brake disc based on mathematical and numerical (CAE) analysis with than associated experimental investigation. Cooperative braking with regenerative braking and mechanical braking plays an important role in electric vehicles for energy-saving control. Based on the parallel and the series cooperative braking models, a combined model with a predictive control strategy to get a better cooperative braking performance is presented. The balance problem between the maximum regenerative energy recovery efficiency and the optimum braking stability is solved through an off-line process optimization stream with the collaborative optimization algorithm (CO). To carry out the process optimization stream, the optimal Latin hypercube design (Opt LHD) is presented to discrete the continuous design space. To solve the poor real-time problem of the optimization, a high-precision predictive model based on the off-line optimization data of the combined model is built, and a predictive control strategy is proposed and verified through simulation. The simulation results demonstrate that the predictive control strategy and the combined model are reasonable and effective.
Facing the pressure of energy and environment, in the world,the development of electric vehicles and automobile energy saving and recycling has formed a broad consensus,, its further development of automotive technology will be the development of powerful impetus.
譯文：
汽車(chē)再生制動(dòng)器的研究
在汽車(chē)產(chǎn)業(yè)，多年前就已經(jīng)確認(rèn)把減輕汽車(chē)質(zhì)量作為提高產(chǎn)品競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力和盈利的手段，在汽車(chē)上裝載再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)被一部分地區(qū)檢驗(yàn)為減輕汽車(chē)質(zhì)量行之有效的方法。電動(dòng)汽車(chē)和混合動(dòng)力電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的最大優(yōu)點(diǎn)是它們能夠通過(guò)再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)回收大量的制動(dòng)能量，再生制動(dòng)器能夠有效的延長(zhǎng)制動(dòng)盤(pán)的使用壽命，減輕制動(dòng)盤(pán)轉(zhuǎn)子的質(zhì)量，盡量減少剎車(chē)片的磨損以及使電動(dòng)汽車(chē)和混合動(dòng)力電動(dòng)汽車(chē)被廣泛使用。再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)會(huì)擴(kuò)展電動(dòng)汽車(chē)或混合動(dòng)力電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的適用范圍。再生制動(dòng)器能夠通過(guò)減少任何額外能量的損耗來(lái)達(dá)到幫助電動(dòng)汽車(chē)和混合動(dòng)力電動(dòng)汽車(chē)擴(kuò)大適用范圍的目的，在這同時(shí)也會(huì)減少自身負(fù)載，有延長(zhǎng)制動(dòng)轉(zhuǎn)子和摩擦材料使用壽命的優(yōu)勢(shì)，但更重要的是，減輕了制動(dòng)器的質(zhì)量，減少了剎車(chē)片的磨損。本研究的目的是確定輕型盤(pán)式制動(dòng)器的熱性能，熱性能是利用三維有限元分析模型的關(guān)鍵因素，最后一個(gè)，輕型制動(dòng)器的設(shè)計(jì)適用于任何尺寸的混合動(dòng)力汽車(chē)，這項(xiàng)研究需要減少轉(zhuǎn)子厚度，因?yàn)樗鼤?huì)影響溫度的分布范圍且增加臨界區(qū)域基于轉(zhuǎn)子的質(zhì)量、厚度、倒底效應(yīng)、以及帽和摩擦環(huán)之間的偏移量的關(guān)系的應(yīng)力，汽車(chē)再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)中輕型制動(dòng)盤(pán)的設(shè)計(jì)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)已經(jīng)建立。
據(jù)估計(jì)，客車(chē)中多達(dá)百分之七十的動(dòng)能都會(huì)通過(guò)摩擦制動(dòng)器被浪費(fèi)掉，而另外的百分之三十的能量能夠以電能的形式被回收，從動(dòng)能轉(zhuǎn)化到熱能需要摩擦制動(dòng)器，所以這將會(huì)減少系統(tǒng)中的一次再生制動(dòng)，其余的能量能夠通過(guò)電機(jī)\發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)來(lái)轉(zhuǎn)化為電能，當(dāng)一輛裝有再生制動(dòng)器的車(chē)處于緊急制動(dòng)的情況下時(shí)，仍會(huì)有大約總動(dòng)能百分之七十的能量被前盤(pán)式制動(dòng)器給浪費(fèi)掉。
把減輕重量作為一種提高產(chǎn)品競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的方法，從而實(shí)現(xiàn)商業(yè)上的成功。為了達(dá)到減輕重量的目的，鐵和鋼制作的車(chē)身部件會(huì)被一些重新設(shè)計(jì)過(guò)的由聚合物或鋁制成的部件所取代。用鋁和相關(guān)復(fù)合材料例如金屬基復(fù)合材料來(lái)制作制動(dòng)盤(pán)已經(jīng)被廣泛的研究。雖然鋁越來(lái)越多的用于現(xiàn)代汽車(chē)的制動(dòng)部件，但現(xiàn)代汽車(chē)制動(dòng)的摩擦性能和熱性能要求限制了鋁在制動(dòng)盤(pán)上的應(yīng)用。摩擦制動(dòng)器在工作時(shí)產(chǎn)生熱量，熱量通過(guò)強(qiáng)制對(duì)流、傳導(dǎo)和輻射從制動(dòng)器的暴露表面上消散。過(guò)熱會(huì)導(dǎo)致制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的故障，并出現(xiàn)安全隱患。許多有關(guān)于制動(dòng)過(guò)程中處于不同溫度和制動(dòng)器設(shè)計(jì)類(lèi)型之下的準(zhǔn)確的溫度上升量的理論工作已經(jīng)完成，因此，制動(dòng)盤(pán)的熱負(fù)荷程度已經(jīng)是是眾所周知的了。
盤(pán)式制動(dòng)器因?yàn)樗玫纳嵝阅芏粡V泛應(yīng)用于轎車(chē)上，雖然會(huì)直接導(dǎo)致摩擦表面的磨損。鼓式制動(dòng)器的摩擦表面是內(nèi)部散熱，散熱是靠熱傳導(dǎo)，因此，汽車(chē)制造商只能在低性能汽車(chē)的后橋上安裝鼓式制動(dòng)器。另外，鼓式制動(dòng)器能提供一個(gè)非常有效的停車(chē)制動(dòng)。在世界各地，鼓式制動(dòng)器仍被廣泛應(yīng)用于商用車(chē)上，因?yàn)槠浣Y(jié)實(shí)耐用且易于維護(hù)，但在歐洲重型車(chē)輛上現(xiàn)在仍使用盤(pán)式制動(dòng)器。此外，性能要求不是一個(gè)孤立的制動(dòng)器運(yùn)用，而是一系列高減速制動(dòng)的應(yīng)用形式的饋效評(píng)估，被稱為“褪色”的測(cè)試部分。因此，典型的客車(chē)前輪制動(dòng)器的設(shè)計(jì)必須要提供一個(gè)很大的制動(dòng)力矩，且能承受高溫、傳熱和熱負(fù)荷等要求。一輛汽車(chē)盤(pán)式制動(dòng)器的大小取決于性能要求，特別是制動(dòng)力矩和能量耗散功率。一個(gè)小的制動(dòng)器也有可能產(chǎn)生一個(gè)較大的制動(dòng)力矩，但是它所涉及到的能量和功率可能會(huì)超載并造成部件的損傷。輕型制動(dòng)盤(pán)（尺寸小，使用較輕的材料，產(chǎn)生的負(fù)荷較?。┠茉谘b有再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的客車(chē)上使用。再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)是混合動(dòng)力電動(dòng)汽車(chē)和純電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的一個(gè)明顯特征，用它來(lái)回收一些在制動(dòng)過(guò)程中浪費(fèi)的能量。電動(dòng)汽車(chē)和混合動(dòng)力電動(dòng)汽車(chē)能利用再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)回收大量的制動(dòng)能量并把它們轉(zhuǎn)化為電能儲(chǔ)存起來(lái)。但是，即使是有了再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)，摩擦制動(dòng)器仍然是必須的，要靠它來(lái)在某些情況下例如車(chē)輛的緊急停靠產(chǎn)生高制動(dòng)性，所以，再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)不得不與常規(guī)摩擦制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)一起工作，因?yàn)閷?duì)一個(gè)純粹的再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)來(lái)說(shuō)，緊急制動(dòng)情況下的功率太高了，這主要是因?yàn)殡娔軆?chǔ)存設(shè)備的能量轉(zhuǎn)移率的限制。再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)不僅減輕了摩擦制動(dòng)器的工作壓力，從而延長(zhǎng)了制動(dòng)盤(pán)的用壽命，減輕了轉(zhuǎn)子的質(zhì)量，盡量減少了制動(dòng)片的磨損，而且還擴(kuò)大了電動(dòng)汽車(chē)和混合動(dòng)力電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的工作范圍。
電動(dòng)汽車(chē)中的再生制動(dòng)器在電池已經(jīng)完全充電或者電池處于很高的溫度的情況下是不允許使用的，因?yàn)檫@會(huì)對(duì)電池造成損害。汽車(chē)在低車(chē)速的情況下制動(dòng)時(shí)，也有可能產(chǎn)生一個(gè)高的扭轉(zhuǎn)力矩，導(dǎo)致汽車(chē)的操控穩(wěn)定性下降。在使用無(wú)級(jí)變速器來(lái)保證電機(jī)\發(fā)電機(jī)處于最佳的運(yùn)行轉(zhuǎn)速的情況下，這就需要小心的操控來(lái)避免制動(dòng)不良情況的發(fā)生。Ehsan在研究從混合動(dòng)力汽車(chē)中回收制動(dòng)能量。他通過(guò)電腦仿真分析一個(gè)城市驅(qū)動(dòng)循環(huán)中回收的制動(dòng)能量與總制動(dòng)能量之間的關(guān)系。他的研究結(jié)果表明，在一個(gè)城市驅(qū)動(dòng)循環(huán)體系中，有百分之五十到百分之六十的制動(dòng)能量是能夠被再生制動(dòng)器回收的，再生制動(dòng)器能夠回收的能量大約占一輛城市公交總制動(dòng)能量的百分之四十五。
在一個(gè)輕型制動(dòng)盤(pán)中，摩擦環(huán)與輪轂之間的鏈接的設(shè)計(jì)是至關(guān)重要的，這個(gè)連接點(diǎn)的重要性在許多年前已經(jīng)被大眾認(rèn)識(shí)到了。汽車(chē)制動(dòng)盤(pán)設(shè)計(jì)人員在設(shè)計(jì)制動(dòng)盤(pán)上所謂“頂帽”地區(qū)的時(shí)候都是十分小心翼翼的。在摩擦面上安裝頂帽以及切凹槽的設(shè)計(jì)都使錐旋被控制在一個(gè)可接受的范圍內(nèi)。但是，這里提出的這種類(lèi)型的制動(dòng)盤(pán)有一個(gè)完全不同的溫度分布，它表現(xiàn)在制動(dòng)過(guò)程中溫度所能達(dá)到的范圍以及溫度在制動(dòng)盤(pán)上的分布狀況。這種情況也出現(xiàn)在了安裝在摩托車(chē)上的輕型制動(dòng)盤(pán)上。國(guó)際應(yīng)用物理和數(shù)學(xué)雜志3卷上指出，在負(fù)荷是不相同的情況下，它對(duì)于一輛客車(chē)上制動(dòng)盤(pán)的溫度范圍和分布情況給出了一個(gè)預(yù)計(jì)，并對(duì)錐旋也進(jìn)行了預(yù)估。所以該雜志提出一個(gè)建議，那就是必須采取措施來(lái)保持錐旋在操作中處于可接受的范圍內(nèi)。
可以得出結(jié)論，就機(jī)械強(qiáng)度和熱強(qiáng)度而言，不銹鋼是一種適合用來(lái)制作輕型制動(dòng)盤(pán)的材料，它會(huì)比用其它材料制作而成的襯墊更加的優(yōu)越，此外它的摩擦學(xué)特性也完全合乎標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。不銹鋼適合用于制作厚度低于8毫米的制動(dòng)盤(pán)，因?yàn)椴讳P鋼的拉伸強(qiáng)度是鑄鐵的三倍。由于它的高導(dǎo)熱率和較低的彈性模量使它適合用于制造厚度低于8毫米的制動(dòng)盤(pán)或者更大的鑄鐵盤(pán)。這也會(huì)限制由摩擦所產(chǎn)生的熱通量引起的制動(dòng)盤(pán)的損傷。當(dāng)選擇最合適用來(lái)制作制動(dòng)盤(pán)的材料的時(shí)候，除了已經(jīng)被羅列的這么一些特性以外，材料的熱容量也被證明與材料的熱傳導(dǎo)率同樣重要。制動(dòng)盤(pán)的材質(zhì)如果能擁有更高熱容量的話，就可以最大限度的降低最高的表面溫度以及作用于制動(dòng)盤(pán)表面的最大應(yīng)力。不銹鋼似乎是一個(gè)很好的制造輕型制動(dòng)盤(pán)的材料，因?yàn)樗叩腗OT，所以它比鋁基復(fù)合材料更加適用于制作制動(dòng)盤(pán)。人們通過(guò)設(shè)計(jì)不銹鋼制成的制動(dòng)盤(pán)來(lái)盡量減少應(yīng)力和變形。
這項(xiàng)研究工作在汽車(chē)的制動(dòng)領(lǐng)域的貢獻(xiàn)是雙重的。首先，當(dāng)汽車(chē)上裝載有再生制動(dòng)器以后，摩擦制動(dòng)器的體積和質(zhì)量都能夠得以縮小，要減輕制動(dòng)盤(pán)的質(zhì)量不需要考慮溫度、應(yīng)力、磨損、變形和耐久性等因素。其次，在這項(xiàng)研究中開(kāi)發(fā)的例子說(shuō)明采用輕型固體式制動(dòng)盤(pán)來(lái)減輕制動(dòng)盤(pán)的質(zhì)量是可行的。文中還提出一種基于數(shù)學(xué)和數(shù)值的分析與之相關(guān)的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究的設(shè)計(jì)方法。再生制動(dòng)和機(jī)械制動(dòng)的協(xié)同制動(dòng)在電動(dòng)汽車(chē)節(jié)能控制中起著重要的作用?；诓⒙?lián)和串聯(lián)的協(xié)同制動(dòng)模型，提出了一種基于預(yù)測(cè)控制策略的組合模型，得到了較好的協(xié)同制動(dòng)性能。最大的再生能量回收效率和最佳的制動(dòng)穩(wěn)定性之間的平衡問(wèn)題，解決了通過(guò)離線過(guò)程優(yōu)化流的協(xié)同優(yōu)化算法（合作）。開(kāi)展流程優(yōu)化流，最佳拉丁超立方體設(shè)計(jì)（選擇鏟運(yùn)機(jī)）提出了離散的連續(xù)的設(shè)計(jì)空間。為了解決優(yōu)化問(wèn)題的實(shí)時(shí)性問(wèn)題，建立了基于組合模型離線優(yōu)化數(shù)據(jù)的高精度預(yù)測(cè)模型，并通過(guò)仿真驗(yàn)證了預(yù)測(cè)控制策略。仿真結(jié)果表明，預(yù)測(cè)控制策略和組合模型是合理的和有效的。
面對(duì)能源和環(huán)境的壓力，發(fā)展電動(dòng)汽車(chē)，實(shí)現(xiàn)汽車(chē)節(jié)能與能量回收，在國(guó)際上已經(jīng)形成了廣泛共識(shí)，，它的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展將會(huì)對(duì)汽車(chē)技術(shù)的發(fā)展產(chǎn)生強(qiáng)大的推動(dòng)力。
畢 業(yè) 設(shè) 計(jì)（論 文）大 綱
設(shè)計(jì)（論文）題目：
無(wú)人駕駛電動(dòng)汽車(chē)再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的設(shè)
?
計(jì)
學(xué)生姓名：
專(zhuān)??業(yè)：
所在學(xué)院：
指導(dǎo)教師：
職??稱：
?
年12月30日
無(wú)人駕駛電動(dòng)汽車(chē)再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的設(shè)計(jì)
1 緒論
1.1課題研究背景及意義
1.2無(wú)人駕駛電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的概述
1.3課題國(guó)內(nèi)外研究現(xiàn)狀及發(fā)展趨勢(shì)
1.4本文的研究意義及主要研究?jī)?nèi)容
2 再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的基本原理
2.1汽車(chē)制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的結(jié)構(gòu)組成
2.2再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的工作原理
2.3再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的設(shè)計(jì)要求
2.4常見(jiàn)的再生制動(dòng)方式
2.5本章小結(jié)
3 再生制動(dòng)力的計(jì)算與修正
3.1再生制動(dòng)力的限制因素分析
3.2某一電動(dòng)汽車(chē)的技術(shù)參數(shù)
3.3制動(dòng)力分配系數(shù)計(jì)算
3.4電機(jī)峰值轉(zhuǎn)矩限制計(jì)算
3.5根據(jù)電池充電功率限制的修正
3.6綜合修正
3.7本章小結(jié)
4 能量的回收
4.1儲(chǔ)能器件的選擇
4.2超級(jí)電容的基本原理
4.3超級(jí)電容的特性
4.4超級(jí)電容組的均壓分析
4.5本章小結(jié)
5 再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的建模與仿真
5.1再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)建模
5.2再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)仿真工況及評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的選擇
5.3常規(guī)制動(dòng)工況下的仿真分析
5.4循環(huán)工況下的仿真結(jié)果與分析
5.5不同傳動(dòng)系統(tǒng)結(jié)構(gòu)對(duì)比仿真分析
5.6本章小結(jié)
6 再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)的控制
6.1再生控制系統(tǒng)的控制策略
6.2再生制動(dòng)系統(tǒng)控制策略的仿真與結(jié)果
6.3本章小結(jié)
7 結(jié)論與展望